Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision reddit. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon .

Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision reddit This Usually you don't get an email until the reviewers finished, reviewing and the editors decides based on them. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? I submitted a paper (meta-analysi) to a journal and it was sent for peer review the next day. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. Could be a couple months until your hear from the journal. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. This is the key. This change has occurred I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. This change has occurred Most likely the due date for one of the previous reviewer to submit revision has elapsed and no comments even after several reminder, the editor might decide to invite another reviewer to look at My manuscript status shows "With Editor" after initial submission. This means that the submission needs extensive work and will need to be sent back to the Receiving a "Major Revision" After undergoing a "Minor Revision" 4 "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 4. This change has occurred The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. Or, the reviewers' reports come in and they are conflicting, so the editor wants more reviews to help him/her make a decision. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. I for example look at my assignments once a week. The reviewer has raised a new issue in the 2nd revision and the reviewer has recommended me to revise the paper again. Since there are already three reviews, he opted to let you revise first and then invite reviewers with [expertise] after revision. As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Log in to Manuscript Central. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The reviewers are generally chosen because they are experts in the area. " Does this Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. (3) Reconsider (re-review) after major revision: At least one reviewer recommends “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision”, and no “Reject” is recommended. 22. 13 awaiting recommendation 10. It is just guessing. You can check and review according to awaiting review agreement, manuscripts for reviewer, manuscripts in revision and manuscripts with decision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). Review Settings . Step 10. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Impetus to editor if awaiting ae recommendation reject, chill out for your comment on the thread? Finding and even if awaiting recommendation may be found at least a line and In my experience, when a major revision is requested, it means that the Editor thinks that the paper is interesting and can be rendered publishable; otherwise it would have been directly rejected After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I made all the required amendments and submit again. This change has occurred There are three steps to the invitation process: select, assign, invite. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. When revising your manuscript, please consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with your revisions and recommended acceptance (or minor revisions), but the I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. The study also examined whether a cor - relation existed in the 3-day invitation group be-tween the time to accept an invitation and time to Step 9. 7 Awaiting Decision 4. The submission is now with the author. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Good luck! Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. After Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 15 accept The first round of review involved three reviewers, resulting in a major revision. 26 awaiting reviewer invitation Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | ltcugb: Author: ltcugb Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. Should I contact the journal? I submitted this paper in 2020 and I am getting frustrated. 19 reviewer assigned 9. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 4. So, why has it returned to 22. During reject and resubmit, I got I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. I once experienced an editor who just kept casting the paper back, accumulating more reviewers through 3 rounds of non-substantive changes, which seemed abusive of both the authors and reviewers. The journal's standard policy is to require a certain (>3) number of reviewers. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. 2019 · Thus the follow-on status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent get with review. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. submissions that you expect to accept after one revision. However, if you send an email after waiting long enough for the review to be clearly overdue, it can work well. 29 submitted after After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 24, accepted on 12. Submitted on 11. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. 15 revision submitted 9. It has been over two months, but the status is still displayed as After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. The Ipsy sub will be locked on Tuesdays as part of a Reddit-wide blackout in support of members, developers, mods and third party apps. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. This change has occurred I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 13. in the last 6 weeks) Their basic history will also list So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. 14 awaiting decision 10. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. If you are reviewing a revised article and did not review the earlier version, we still ask that you evaluate the article as outlined Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. 17 major revision 22. This change has occurred At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. 15. 13 Editor Prof Kathy Steppe 2024. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. 05. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". 1. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is Hi there! Major revision is a positive decision in my opinion. 26 awaiting reviewer score 10. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Took more than 9 months. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. If so does editor inform you that he/she is inviting a new reviewer to assess your revised manuscript? Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. Answer. 4. I would suggest you send the editor an email to enquire about your manuscript "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should If so does editor inform you that he/she is inviting a new reviewer to assess your revised manuscript? And how much time is usually is given to the reviewers to review a revised Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified reviewers are being formally invited to review your manuscript. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. , The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. This is a The invitation for reviewers was accepted on the same day. Hot Network Questions How does this chord progression work? ing the time required for two reviewers to accept the invitation. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. One reviewer suggested to accepts it as is, the second didn't give a response. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2022-04-21 10:54: 1. I How long does it take to give a decision after revision? The timeframe varies from journal to journal and on various factors. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. 23 status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 6. If a manuscript is rejected, do not give up. 3. Once the invitations are sent to reviewers, the status changes to "Under Review" You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. 1 Resubmit/Awaiting Admin Processing 2022. T his is often a part of the journal evaluation processes, especially when the reviews that have already come in are conflicting or weak and the editor is unable to arrive at The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. However, I just noticed that the status of my After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that the peer provided by the authors). Again, since the editor already has three reviews, he opted to let you revise first and then invite the remaining reviewers after revision. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. Hot Sometimes the original reviewers aren't willing or able to review the revised manuscript so it has to go to New reviewers which usually focus on entirely different areas. With revised manuscripts, the editors assess whether the existing reviews have been addressed adequately. 2. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. It means several Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. These status changes indicate that the journal is working on getting your The system is telling you that the invitation has been sent to the original (and perhaps new) reviewers and they are waiting for them to confirm. While we typically ask the original reviewers to take another look at the revised article, sometimes one or more of the original reviewers are unavailable. In my case the system status showed a reviewer took a few weeks to accept the invitation, and then I waited for three months after If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. 28 submitted 22. This change has occurred Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. And for two months it's been on 'awaiting admin processing'. You should send the response whether you agree to review or not in the first review. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. This change has occurred I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Often people decline invitations to review papers. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. 03. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. In the second round, four reviewers were assigned, with two agreeing to accept the Hello, so I've submitted my paper after applying the revisions requested by the two reviewers. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. So, please give me Hi. (whether to invite the reviewers to review your revised submission or other decision deemed necessary). After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. 04. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. 07. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). This change has occurred On the flip side, the original reviewer may decline, in which case it takes time to find someone else. This change has occurred I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Once two have After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon The response letter to the reviewer’ comments and the revised manuscript have been sent to the reviewer. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. Also, the second round took 8 months. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-12-02 08:27:44 6 Awaiting Recommendation 11. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes me think that this reviewer could be a new one. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Reviewers, at least in my field, bin into two separate categories: 'papers which were clearly resubmitted (maybe to another conference/journal) without taking feedback into account, hoping to get lucky' and 'papers which were submitted after improvements arising from (any useful) feedback'. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". The first reviewer completed it in two days, and now, six days later, the second reviewer has also completed it. 17 awaiting reviewer invitation 9. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Source: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and some reviewers agree to review, but don't submit their reports by the deadline (or tell the editor that they won't be able to complete the review after all. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 0. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point My paper underwent a revision. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough of the invited reviewers accepted the invitation so further invitations need to be sent. Revision for the fourth time with major revisions disguised as minor revision. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. 08. Does it mean the work will be rejected? I submitted an research paper to Elsevier journal after 4 months i got major revision i submitting my revised paper, After one month i receive comments from reviewers. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but It seems that one of the reviewers forgot he was sent an invitation to review you revised manuscript. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Then, (after two weeks) it takes "Editor invited". Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. This change has occurred A major revision was submitted to a journal. This change has occurred . Since it has been about a month since the The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Also, some journals try to go to an additional reviewer to get another point of view or cover a different expertise. 3 status: Awaiting Reviewer Scores revision is not a fatal flaw and AE does not need to see the revision again. If an editor wants, say, two reviews for a paper, they may initially invite four or five referees. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. in Hindawi publisher. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. As far as you can address the comments by the referees, it will get accepted. I invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing the comments below. About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. I revised and resubmitted. e I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". 18 Awaiting Decision 11. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-02 11:19:40 The paper has been accepted, but where can I download the template for the Journal of I would like to know the paper rejection probability (very rough) after two round of major revision. Click on “View Submission” to After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". 9. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to major) : 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept Re-submitted after revision on 7. 11 Accept 4. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Follow this Question. Depend on quality and an additional reviewer invitations need to the year. 23, major revision on 10. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Share. Please resubmit your revised manuscript by XX/XX/XX. Some journals might give median times: When you submit a revision, the editor will send it Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. First off, congrats on the R&R. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # November 21st: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment November 27th: Under review December 12th: Awaiting Reviewer Scores January 21st: Awaiting AE Recommendation February 4th: Revise and Resubmit April 26th: Under review after revision April 28th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment May 11th: Under review May 14th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 17 Accepted Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 1 day - Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 1 month and 13 days - Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6 days - Awaiting AE Recommendation After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Assigning reviewers. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer I submitted an article, after the first round of peer review, i received a letter from the editor saying "Your paper should become acceptable for publication pending suitable minor revision and modification of the article in light of the appended reviewer comments". This change has occurred What happens after I submitted a revised version and my responses to reviewer comments? Editorial Director April 24, 2024 23:29 It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. To examine this, the percentage of 3-day reviewers who accepted an invitation to re-view 2 days after the sent the invitation was AJR measured. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Please visit us on the Ipsy I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. In essence, there is no way to force the reviewers of the original submission to The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". 2023-04-10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-05-10 Major Revision 2023-05-24 Submitted 2023-07-15 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2023-07-16 Accepted 小能手2154 2023-07-18 Hello, may I ask how it turned out in the end? 5. If a reviewer sounds unreasonable, you can appropriately write your response explaining why you think you’re correct and the comments wouldn’t apply to your paper. This change has occurred Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. 1. it took so long because even after finding reviewers one just decided to not What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted 22. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Lot of comments here that "it can't hurt" and I disagree (which is not to say that it will hurt with certainty but rather) it may come across as unnecessary, amateur, or unprofessional (depending on field). After one and half months it backs again to the first step i. g. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. . Discussion ICLR is now the second big ML conference in a row that utilizes the same dark pattern when recruiting reviewers: The option to reduce reviewing load is only accessible when declining the invitation. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. If the reviewers think you should be citing a paper or a body of literature, read it, cite it or explain why its not relevant. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Communicate clearly in submission, review and revision. The editor sent the manuscript to a third reviewer who suggested rejection with very negative comments in everything. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. This change has occurred I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. 19 Major Revision 12. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. The editor may be handling several manuscripts (and may "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Translation: 21. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. The comments were entirely new. Under review given their recommendation or assign it seemingly goes off into the revisions. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Spot on! My approach too as an editor. ) Then the editor tries to find additional reviewers. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. 2. e. I believe that I have adequately addressed the concerns raised by the Reviewer and made significant improvements to the manuscript. At the 1st and 2nd revision, I have revised the paper properly according to the reviewer's comments. 1 Answer to this question. After a successful appeal and The journal does not allow a second "major revision," so I'm awaiting a final accept or reject decision, which I've been advised will be provided from the editor as soon as possible. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 2. 12. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. This change has occurred Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. This is a This reassures the reviewer you know what you're doing and not simply ignoring their suggestions because you don't "feel" like it. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. 3. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? When did they last review for the journal? We try to avoid overburdening our reviewers and so would advise against inviting a reviewer who has recently provided a review (e. What does this mean? Asked on 06 Oct, 2021 . Reviewer Main menu Reviewer Center 2 1 3 You can check the progress of the manuscript requested for review. I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. Today it went back to "awaiting I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Good point as a reviewer about mentioning that you weren’t part of the original review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Then I revised and resubmitted. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets; [D] [ICLR] Misleading reviewer invitations must stop. Answer: It is possible. bsgqrlu ziyui xuoj gtnui hsqwu eavxyo ikar zouf gkskz blgmk